Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You may say "please don't drop nuclear weapon". You may *not* say "you
> must not drop nuclear weapon", that would violate GPL.
I can see the headline/FUD now:
FREE SOFTWARE FANATICS REFUSE TO DISAVOW USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
:-)
--
[O]ne of the fe
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > > It seems that people are using open source software to do idiotic
> > > things. Many open source references were made in the article, I should
> > > see if the article is online at all to maybe be able to use it as a
> > > reference.
> >
> > You probably mean that one:
>
> > It seems that people are using open source software to do idiotic
> > things. Many open source references were made in the article, I should
> > see if the article is online at all to maybe be able to use it as a
> > reference.
>
> You probably mean that one:
> http://www.usatoday.com/life/cy
On Wed, 07. Feb 2001 at 01:40:56 -0500 Michael B. Trausch wrote:
>
> This is very intesting seeing as the story I read in the Newspaper (USA
> Today) on encryption and terrorism today is an example of this.
>
> It seems that people are using open source software to do idiotic
> things. Many open
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > > Your "ethical" statement is incompatible with the GPL.
> > >
> > > I disagree. Its a statement. Its a request. It says 'advice'. Anyone is
> > > entitled to advise how to use GPL software. The only issue is if someone
> > > chooses to r
Hi!
> > > > Your "ethical" statement is incompatible with the GPL.
> >
> > I disagree. Its a statement. Its a request. It says 'advice'. Anyone is
> > entitled to advise how to use GPL software. The only issue is if someone
> > chooses to require it is not used by XYZ person.
>
> Please.. I am
> > > Your "ethical" statement is incompatible with the GPL.
>
> I disagree. Its a statement. Its a request. It says 'advice'. Anyone is
> entitled to advise how to use GPL software. The only issue is if someone
> chooses to require it is not used by XYZ person.
Please.. I am not lawyer... my i
[ac]
> Vast amounts of debian included code contains suggestions about use.
I'll not dispute your word because I know you for an objective person.
But I don't remember coming across any such examples at least recently.
Maybe I just don't remember them because they didn't sound like, well,
manif
> It *does*, however, violate the DFSG, at least in spirit (since it is
> only a suggestion). For what it's worth, the DFSG is my standard for
> whether a particular project is worth my time to contribute code to.
Vast amounts of debian included code contains suggestions about use.
> Also, Rob
[Roberto Diaz]
> > I am trying to make a manifesto in order to attach it to all my
> > gpl'd developments..
[Rik van Riel]
> Quoted from the GPL:
> ---
> 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
> Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from th
> > Your "ethical" statement is incompatible with the GPL.
I disagree. Its a statement. Its a request. It says 'advice'. Anyone is
entitled to advise how to use GPL software. The only issue is if someone
chooses to require it is not used by XYZ person.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
This is very intesting seeing as the story I read in the Newspaper (USA
Today) on encryption and terrorism today is an example of this.
It seems that people are using open source software to do idiotic
things. Many open source references were made in the article, I should
see if the article is o
> Quoted from the GPL:
> ---
> 6. Each time you redistribute the Program (or any work based on the
> Program), the recipient automatically receives a license from the
> original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the Program subject to
> these terms and conditions. You may not impose an
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Roberto Diaz wrote:
> I am trying to make a manifesto in order to attach it to all my
> gpl'd developments..
> I am doing this because gpl'd developments usually involves
> people all around the world.. and being aware that a lot of
> gpl'd / GNU resources are used by fascist
14 matches
Mail list logo
