Re: Scheduling while atomic errors on swsusp resume

2005-03-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > Well, those are warnings, so it still works, right? Aha, "exited with > > preempt count 1" seems very wrong. Yes, please try this with > > vanilla. I'm running 2.6.11 with > > Yeah, the resume script crashes, which is a bit of a problem. I'll get > the user to try with a vanilla kernel,

Re: Scheduling while atomic errors on swsusp resume

2005-03-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:26 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Well, those are warnings, so it still works, right? Aha, "exited with > preempt count 1" seems very wrong. Yes, please try this with > vanilla. I'm running 2.6.11 with Yeah, the resume script crashes, which is a bit of a problem. I'll get

Re: Scheduling while atomic errors on swsusp resume

2005-03-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > Using the current Ubuntu development kernel (2.6.10 with acpi and swsusp > stuff backported from 2.6.11), a user is getting the following trace on > resume. Passing noapic nolapic removes the APIC error, but the rest of > the trace is identical. This is reproducible, but only seems to happen