Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Sören Brinkmann
On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:36:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Sören, > > On 20/07/16 14:16, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > Hi Marc, > > > Does anybody have similar problems and probably already solved it? > > Any other suggestions for approaching the problem? Any preferred > > solution?

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Marc Zyngier
Hi Sören, On 20/07/16 14:16, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi Marc, > Does anybody have similar problems and probably already solved it? > Any other suggestions for approaching the problem? Any preferred > solution? I think we have the same problem. Can you provide more detail o

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Andy Gross
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 06:16:06AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 09:17:16 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 20/07/16 00:34, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 17:47:13 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > > >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi Thomas, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 08:28:35 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > we are working on the PM solution for Zynq MPSOC and ran into some > > problem when setting the wake source. > > > > The situation is that when the A53 is in suspend, the GIC(

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi Marc, On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 09:17:16 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 20/07/16 00:34, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > Hi Andy, > > > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 17:47:13 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18:04AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> we are working on

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-20 Thread Marc Zyngier
On 20/07/16 00:34, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi Andy, > > On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 17:47:13 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18:04AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> we are working on the PM solution for Zynq MPSOC and ran into some >>> problem when setting the wake

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Andy Gross wrote: > So not too long ago there were irq extensions that you could add in to an > irq controller that would allow for intercepting the set wake calls. This > went away and was replaced by the hierarchical irq design. For a very good reason. The 'extensions' wer

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-19 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > we are working on the PM solution for Zynq MPSOC and ran into some > problem when setting the wake source. > > The situation is that when the A53 is in suspend, the GIC(v2) may be > powered down. In that state a companion core is handling wake > events

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-19 Thread Sören Brinkmann
Hi Andy, On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 17:47:13 -0500, Andy Gross wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18:04AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we are working on the PM solution for Zynq MPSOC and ran into some > > problem when setting the wake source. > > > > The situation is that when the

Re: SOC-specific action for irq_set_wake

2016-07-19 Thread Andy Gross
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:18:04AM -0700, Sören Brinkmann wrote: > Hi, > > we are working on the PM solution for Zynq MPSOC and ran into some > problem when setting the wake source. > > The situation is that when the A53 is in suspend, the GIC(v2) may be > powered down. In that state a companion