Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-23 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 05:14:04PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > I'm just a German. Forgive me if I drink lesser beverages. > > > > You should definitely change that. > > Change being German? Not a bad idea, actually. You cook up really tasty shnaps, in small quantities it

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-23 Thread Jörn Engel
On Wed, 23 May 2007 19:07:32 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > wrote: > > On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:30:52 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > And what if it is 33 bits? Or it is not allowed? Not allowed. Both number and size

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-23 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 02:58:41PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:30:52 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > In that case segment size must be more than 32 bits, or below > > transformation will not be correct? > > Must it? If segment size is just 20bit t

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-23 Thread Jörn Engel
On Sun, 20 May 2007 21:30:52 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > In that case segment size must be more than 32 bits, or below > transformation will not be correct? Must it? If segment size is just 20bit then the filesystem may only be 52bit. Or 51bit when using signed values. > segsize is long

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-20 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 07:10:19PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thu, 17 May 2007 20:03:11 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > > > Is logfs 32bit fs or 674bit, since although you use 64bit values for > > offsets, area management and strange converstions like described below > >

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-17 Thread Jörn Engel
On Thu, 17 May 2007 20:03:11 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > > Is logfs 32bit fs or 674bit, since although you use 64bit values for > offsets, area management and strange converstions like described below > from offset into segment number are performed in 32bit? > Is it enough for SSD for exampl

Re: Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three)

2007-05-17 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
Hi Jörn. Is logfs 32bit fs or 674bit, since although you use 64bit values for offsets, area management and strange converstions like described below from offset into segment number are performed in 32bit? Is it enough for SSD for example to be 32bit only? Or if it is 64bit, could you please expl