On Wednesday, June 17, 2015 02:42:40 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 01:00:13 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday, June 15, 2015 07:56:05 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier
> > > wrote:
> > > > Below is a more sophisticated,
On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 01:00:13 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, June 15, 2015 07:56:05 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier
> > wrote:
> > > Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a
> > > changelog and
> > > all. It works
On Monday, June 15, 2015 07:56:05 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog
> > and
> > all. It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.
>
> Yes, the patch works
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog and
> all. It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.
Yes, the patch works as expected:
Tested-by: Roland Dreier
It does change /proc/ioports h
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Below is a more sophisticated, so to speak, version of it with a changelog and
> all. It works for me, but more testing would be much appreciated.
Great, I'm convinced by your reasoning that this makes sense. I'm
building 3.10.80 patch
On Friday, June 12, 2015 08:01:15 AM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Changing the ordering between those two routines would work around that
> > problem,
> > but in my view that wouldn't be a proper fix. In fact, the role of
> > reserve_range
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Changing the ordering between those two routines would work around that
> problem,
> but in my view that wouldn't be a proper fix. In fact, the role of
> reserve_range()
> is to reserve the resources so as to prevent them from being us
On Thursday, June 11, 2015 12:01:40 PM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Can you please file a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org to track this and attach
> > the output of acpidump from the affected system in there?
>
> Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Can you please file a bug at bugzilla.kernel.org to track this and attach
> the output of acpidump from the affected system in there?
Done: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99831
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 04:51:35 PM Roland Dreier wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > I understand that the change here fixed another regression, but I'm
> > wondering if there's a way to make everyone happy here? I can provide
> > debugging info from my system as
On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Roland Dreier wrote:
> I understand that the change here fixed another regression, but I'm
> wondering if there's a way to make everyone happy here? I can provide
> debugging info from my system as required...
Maybe sent my mail too quickly, as I have some thought
11 matches
Mail list logo
