Re: Reasons to honor readonly mount requests

Hi! > > I understand that both ext3fs and > > reiserfs will try to fix corrupt filesystems (or at least filesystems > > with unprocessed log entries) in-place even if they're mounted > > read-only. Clearly, virtual replay means more work, but -- just for > > fun -- here are some cases in which i

Re: Reasons to honor readonly mount requests

Jeff writes: > I understand that both ext3fs and > reiserfs will try to fix corrupt filesystems (or at least filesystems > with unprocessed log entries) in-place even if they're mounted > read-only. Clearly, virtual replay means more work, but -- just for > fun -- here are some cases in which it