On Tuesday, April 22, 2014 15:14:33 Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 04/22/2014 02:37 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > On 03/27/2014 02:33 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> >> POSIX or not it just does not have any real programming mining
> >> at all.
> >
> > What do you mean with "mining" in this context?
>
> Sorr
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Jim Lieb wrote:
> On Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:45:30 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jim Lieb wrote:
>> > Rather than inline, I'm responding in the context of Jeremy's comments but
>> > I have to answer others as well. It is Jeremy a
On Thursday, March 27, 2014 12:45:30 Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jim Lieb wrote:
> > Rather than inline, I'm responding in the context of Jeremy's comments but
> > I have to answer others as well. It is Jeremy after all who said my baby
> > was ugly ;).
> >
> > Jer
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Jim Lieb wrote:
> Rather than inline, I'm responding in the context of Jeremy's comments but I
> have to answer others as well. It is Jeremy after all who said my baby was
> ugly ;).
>
> Jeremy is right about overloading "fd". Maybe I can call it something else
Rather than inline, I'm responding in the context of Jeremy's comments but I
have to answer others as well. It is Jeremy after all who said my baby was
ugly ;).
Jeremy is right about overloading "fd". Maybe I can call it something else
but an fd (in implementation) has merit because a creds s
5 matches
Mail list logo
