Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter > where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the

git mailing list (Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3)

On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote: > > Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter > where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of t

Re: Re: Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] git-pasky-0.3

Dear diary, on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 07:01:34PM CEST, I got a letter where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that... > For future reference, git is unhappy if you actually do this, because your > HEAD won't match the (empty) contents of the new directory. The easiest > thing is to cp -r yo