On 4 December 2014 at 10:43, Masami Hiramatsu
wrote:
> (2014/12/04 19:21), Steve Capper wrote:
>> On 4 December 2014 at 02:48, David Long wrote:
>>> On 12/03/14 20:16, William Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
The perf issue seems to be independent and can be reproduced without using
(2014/12/04 19:21), Steve Capper wrote:
> On 4 December 2014 at 02:48, David Long wrote:
>> On 12/03/14 20:16, William Cohen wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> The perf issue seems to be independent and can be reproduced without using
>>> any kprobe support. I need to get a simple reproducer and menti
(2014/12/03 4:27), William Cohen wrote:
> On 12/01/2014 04:37 AM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/11/29 1:01), Steve Capper wrote:
>>> On 27 November 2014 at 06:07, Masami Hiramatsu
>>> wrote:
(2014/11/27 3:59), Steve Capper wrote:
> The crash is extremely easy to reproduce.
>
>
(2014/11/29 1:01), Steve Capper wrote:
> On 27 November 2014 at 06:07, Masami Hiramatsu
> wrote:
>> (2014/11/27 3:59), Steve Capper wrote:
>>> The crash is extremely easy to reproduce.
>>>
>>> I've not observed any missed events on a kprobe on an arm64 system
>>> that's still alive.
>>> My (limite
On 27 November 2014 at 06:07, Masami Hiramatsu
wrote:
> (2014/11/27 3:59), Steve Capper wrote:
>> The crash is extremely easy to reproduce.
>>
>> I've not observed any missed events on a kprobe on an arm64 system
>> that's still alive.
>> My (limited!) understanding is that this suggests there cou
(2014/11/27 3:59), Steve Capper wrote:
> The crash is extremely easy to reproduce.
>
> I've not observed any missed events on a kprobe on an arm64 system
> that's still alive.
> My (limited!) understanding is that this suggests there could be a
> problem with how missed events from a recursive cal
6 matches
Mail list logo
