Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter
Well, yes, but the last merge point search may not be so simple:
A --1---26---7
B\ `-4-. /
C `-3-5'
Now, when at 7, your last merge point is not 1, but 2.
...and this is obviously wrong, sorr
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:50:48AM CEST, I got a letter
where Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:39:40AM CEST, I got a letter
where Geert Uytterhoeven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
..snip..
> > Basically, when you look at merge(1) :
> >
> > SYNOPSIS
> >merge [ options ] file1 file2 file3
> > DESCRIP
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter
> where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
> > >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told
Dear diary, on Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 03:20:18AM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
> >where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> >..snip..
> >> Graydon Hoare. (By
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 20:45:38 +0200, Peter Baudis wrote:
> Hello,
> please do not trim the cc list so agressively.
Sorry. I read the list from a web site that does not show the
cc lists. I'll try to cc more people from the relevant discussions
though. On the other hand, I've dropped Linus fro
Hello,
please do not trim the cc list so agressively.
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:46:38PM CEST, I got a letter
where "Adam J. Richter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Graydon Hoare. (By the way, I would prefer that git just punt to
> user level programs for diff and
* Petr Baudis:
>> Almost certainly, v3 will be incompatible with v2 because it adds
>> further restrictions. This means that your proposal would result in
>> software which is not redistributable by third parties.
>
> Hmm, what would be actually the point in introducing further
> restrictions? An
On 2005-04-11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>I'm inclined to go with GPLv2 just because it's the most common one [...]
You may want to use a file from GPL'ed monotone that
implements a substantial diff optimization described in the August
1989 paper by Sun Wu, Udi Manber and Gene Myers ("An O(NP)
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> * Ingo Molnar:
>
> > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
> > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
>
* Ingo Molnar:
> is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
> once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
> (new files, rewrites, substantial contributions, etc.) get a v3
> copyright? (and the collection itself would be v3 too) That method
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in
> a COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
>
> I'm inclined to go with GPLv2 just because it's the most common one,
> but I was wondering if anybody r
> Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
> COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
I think GPLv2 would create the least amount of objection in the
community, so I'd probably want to go with that.
Nur Hussein
-
To unsubsc
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> ..snip..
> > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> > name suggests, and which should
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
..snip..
> Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Am I just missi
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 02:20:52AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
> COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
>
> I'm inclined to go with G
Btw, does anybody have strong opinions on the license? I didn't put in a
COPYING file exactly because I was torn between GPLv2 and OSL2.1.
I'm inclined to go with GPLv2 just because it's the most common one, but I
was wondering if anybody really had strong opinions. For example, I'd
really ma
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:46:50AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > (BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
> > you give it on input and throws it to an ob
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:39:02PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> > name suggests, and which should be faster
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> (BTW, it would be useful to have a tool which just blindly takes what
> you give it on input and throws it to an object of given type; I will
> need to construct arbitrary commits during the rebuild if I'm to keep
> the correct dates.)
Hah. That's wha
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 01:10:58AM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
> > throw away your previous HEAD record tho
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> I currently already do a merge when you track someone's source - it will
> throw away your previous HEAD record though
Not only that, it doesn't do what I consider a "merge".
A real merge should have two or more parents. The "commit-tree" command
al
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 10:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
> >
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bogging it down so awfully (doing diff-tree takes
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Can you pull my current repo, which has "diff-tree -R" that does what the
> name suggests, and which should be faster than the 0.48 sec you see..
Actually, I changed things around. Everybody hated the "<" ">" lines, so I
put a changed thing on a
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:13:19PM CEST, I got a letter
where Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> > bogging it down so awfully (doi
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> bogging it down so awfully (doing diff-tree takes 0.48s ;-). I do about
> 15 forks per change, I guess, and for some reason cut takes a long of
> time on its own.
Heh.
Can you pul
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 08:45:22PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:
> It turns out to be the forks for doing all the cuts and such what is
> bogging it down so awfully (doing diff-tree takes 0.48s ;-). I do about
> 15 forks per change, I guess, and for some reason cut takes a long of
> time on its own.
Dear diary, on Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 07:45:12PM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > I will also need to do more testing on the linux kernel tree.
> > > > Committing patch-2.6.7 on 2.6.6 kernel and the
28 matches
Mail list logo
