Re: RISC-V Linux Port v6

2017-07-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 7:55 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: >> Without having looked at the current state of the patch series, I would >> guess that next week is a good time to ask f

Re: RISC-V Linux Port v6

2017-07-12 Thread Will Deacon
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > While it's only been a day since the last patch set (which might be a bit > > fast), I've generally been spinning new patch sets whenever I get through my > > inbox. For my

Re: RISC-V Linux Port v6

2017-07-12 Thread Luis R. Rodriguez
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:58:01AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > At this point I'm not really sure how to proceed: reviews have calmed down > > quite a bit over the last two weeks, but I'm not familiar with the Linux > > development proces

Re: RISC-V Linux Port v6

2017-07-12 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:31 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > While it's only been a day since the last patch set (which might be a bit > fast), I've generally been spinning new patch sets whenever I get through my > inbox. For my other patch sets I've managed to get buried in a week's worth > of > e