Re: Proper OOPS report

2001-01-23 Thread Tom
--- Henrik Stokseth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > you were the one with the gcc 2.95.3 compiler right? even though this > compiler is a prerelease of a stable branch i have confirmed errors > in the > optimalization passes. my advice: use a compiler which really IS > stable > (gcc-2.95.2 or egcs-1.

Re: Proper OOPS report

2001-01-23 Thread Tom
--- Bernd Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Details please. > > > Bernd Processor: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 5 model : 8 model name : AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor stepping: 12 cpu MHz : 451.034 cache size : 64 KB fdiv

Re: Proper OOPS report

2001-01-23 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Henrik Stokseth wrote: > you were the one with the gcc 2.95.3 compiler right? even though this > compiler is a prerelease of a stable branch i have confirmed errors in the > optimalization passes. Details please. Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsub

Re: Proper OOPS report

2001-01-22 Thread Russell King
Henrik Stokseth writes: > you were the one with the gcc 2.95.3 compiler right? even though this > compiler is a prerelease of a stable branch i have confirmed errors in the > optimalization passes. my advice: use a compiler which really IS stable > (gcc-2.95.2 or egcs-1.1.2 are fine), or turn off

Re: Proper OOPS report

2001-01-22 Thread Henrik Stokseth
you were the one with the gcc 2.95.3 compiler right? even though this compiler is a prerelease of a stable branch i have confirmed errors in the optimalization passes. my advice: use a compiler which really IS stable (gcc-2.95.2 or egcs-1.1.2 are fine), or turn off all optimalizations. -henrik -