Re: Problems with arch/i386/kernel/apm.c

2001-06-11 Thread John Fremlin
Jeff Golds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Please let me know if this is correct, I can provide a simple patch > if needed. What I am really desiring to know is if there are any > devices that depend on the apm::send_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME) > happening while interrupts are disabled.

Re: Problems with arch/i386/kernel/apm.c

2001-06-11 Thread Alan Cox
> > needed. What I am really desiring to know is if there are any devices > > that depend on the apm::send_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME) happening while > > interrupts are disabled. > > Good spotting... If any devices depend on what you describe, I would > argue that their drivers should handle that

Re: Problems with arch/i386/kernel/apm.c

2001-06-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Jeff Golds wrote: > Please let me know if this is correct, I can provide a simple patch if > needed. What I am really desiring to know is if there are any devices > that depend on the apm::send_event(APM_NORMAL_RESUME) happening while > interrupts are disabled. Good spotting... If any devices d