>May I suggest a smarter way to filter these spammers, by just whitelisting
>email addresses of valid posters, after sending a confirmation for the
>first post. Now if these spammers get smart, and start using personal
>email addresses, I would certainly expect some real action by abused email
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am running an experiment with Postgrey to delay (for 300 seconds
>minimum) incoming emails. If the clients don't retry after this
>delay, then the messages don't usually get in.
So far it is working very well. Usuall
On 12/13/06, Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So a challange to the kernel hackers: build a mail filtering/proxy
system, a' la BSD.
I don't remember the specification and features, but IIRC the
netfilter is not enough to do the graylisting (but pf was).
Someone has some hints what
Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue,
but it gives us
Giacomo A. Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> So a challange to the kernel hackers: build a mail filtering/proxy
> system, a' la BSD.
Has no reason to be in-kernel. Email is a complex subject in and by itself,
don't mix it in here.
> I don't remember the specification and features, bu
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 09:11, Al Boldi wrote:
>Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:25 +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
>> > > I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
>> > > the zombie machine,
Al Boldi wrote:
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:25 +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
My predi
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:25 +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > > I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
> > > the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
> > > My pr
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 11:25 +0200, Dumitru Ciobarcianu wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> > I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
> > the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
> > My prediction for next 200 days is tha
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 01:50 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> I do already see spammers smart enough to retry addresses from
> the zombie machine, but that share is now below 10% of all emails.
> My prediction for next 200 days is that most spammers get the clue,
> but it gives us perhaps 3 months of le
10 matches
Mail list logo
