>The semantic difference being, as far as I can tell, that the "GT"
>counters do not sample randomly, but will rather offer a precise count of
>loads meeting the stated condition.Â
It's all the same underlying hardware event. The only difference is what
threshold
is used for filterin
> now need to dive in deep into the actual implementation. Simple question: is
> this a bug?
These are derived events from MEM_TRANS_RETIRED.LOAD_LATENCY, which is in
the SDM. It's not a bug. In general the event lists used by perf are
newer versions than what is in the SDM.
-Andi
2 matches
Mail list logo
