Am 22.03.2016 um 00:00 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:47:20 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
>> Adding more CC's.
>>
>> Am 16.03.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:5
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 21:47:20 +0100 Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Adding more CC's.
>
> Am 16.03.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> Am 15.03.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > FYI, with a dummy ->migratepage() which returns only -EINVAL UBIFS does no
> > longer explode upon page migration.
> > Tomorrow I'll do more tests to make sure.
>
> Could you check if something like this would fix the issue.
>
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:16:11 +0100
Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're facing this issue from 2014 on UBIFS:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg79941.html
Just to let you know I was able to reproduce the exact same bug on a
sama5d3 with UBIFS + CMA enabled (CMA allocatio
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 09:47:20PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Adding more CC's.
>
> Am 16.03.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> Am 1
Am 17.03.2016 um 08:11 schrieb Joonsoo Kim:
>> It is still not clear why UBIFS has to provide a >migratepage() and what the
>> expected semantics
>> are.
>> What we know so far is that the fall back migration function is broken. I'm
>> sure not only on UBIFS.
>>
>> Can CMA folks please clarify? :
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> > > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >>> Or if ->page_mkwrite() wa
Adding more CC's.
Am 16.03.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:21:56PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:18:50AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >>> Or if ->page_mkwrite() was called, why the page is not dirty?
> >>
> >> BTW: UBIFS does not implement
2016-03-17 17:13 GMT+09:00 Richard Weinberger :
> Am 17.03.2016 um 08:11 schrieb Joonsoo Kim:
>>> It is still not clear why UBIFS has to provide a >migratepage() and what
>>> the expected semantics
>>> are.
>>> What we know so far is that the fall back migration function is broken. I'm
>>> sure n
Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Or if ->page_mkwrite() was called, why the page is not dirty?
>>
>> BTW: UBIFS does not implement ->migratepage(), could this be a problem?
>
> This might be the reason. I c
Christoph,
Am 15.03.2016 um 16:37 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Or if ->page_mkwrite() was called, why the page is not dirty?
>>
>> BTW: UBIFS does not implement ->migratepage(), could this be a problem?
>
> This might be the
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Kirill,
>
> Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:16:11PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> We're facing this issue from 2014 on UBIFS:
> >> http://www.spinics.net/li
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:32:40PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Or if ->page_mkwrite() was called, why the page is not dirty?
>
> BTW: UBIFS does not implement ->migratepage(), could this be a problem?
This might be the reason. I can't reall make sense of
buffer_migrate_page, but it seem
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 04:25:50PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response!
>
> I also don't think that the root cause is CMA or migration but it seems
> to be the messenger.
>
> Can you confirm that UBIFS's assumptions are valid?
> I'm trying to rule out possible issues
Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:16:11PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We're facing this issue from 2014 on UBIFS:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg79941.html
>>
>> So sum up:
>> UBIFS does not allow pages directly marke
Kirill,
Am 15.03.2016 um 16:17 schrieb Kirill A. Shutemov:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:16:11PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> We're facing this issue from 2014 on UBIFS:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg79941.html
>>
>> So sum up:
>> UBIFS does not allow pages direc
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 03:16:11PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We're facing this issue from 2014 on UBIFS:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg79941.html
>
> So sum up:
> UBIFS does not allow pages directly marked as dirty. It want's everyone to do
> it via UBIFS's
> -
18 matches
Mail list logo