> > I don't think the boot time check needs DMI guarding
>
> DMI guarding? I'm not following...
DMI guarding = Making it conditional on a DMI check
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote:
>
> > Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
>
> Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are
> detected, we mark the tsc as unstable.
Turns out I was seeing C2 states. I'll stick with PIT for now.
Thanks,
Ian.
--
Ian Ca
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 17:44 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > > Is there a specific reason the check was removed (I couldn't see on in
> > > the archives) or was it simply overlooked? Without it I need to pass
> > > clocksource=tsc to have 2.6.18 work correctly on an older K6 system with
> > > an Al
>
> > Is there a specific reason the check was removed (I couldn't see on in
> > the archives) or was it simply overlooked? Without it I need to pass
> > clocksource=tsc to have 2.6.18 work correctly on an older K6 system with
> > an Aladdin chipset (will dig out the precise details if required).
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 11:34 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 07:41 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Should tsc be preferred to pit though?
>
> Depends on your system. If C2/C3 or cpufreq state changes are detected,
> we mark the tsc as unstable.
I'm not using them on purpose but I
On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 07:41 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 12:14 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > I don't have a dev box to test on at the moment, but here's a quick hack
> > attempt at re-adding the code. Does the following work for you?
>
> I get:
> PM-Timer running at
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 12:14 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:40 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:19 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:50 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > In older kernels arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c:verify_pm
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 19:40 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:19 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:50 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > In older kernels arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c:verify_pmtmr_rate
> > > contained a check for sensible PMTMR rate and d
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 11:19 -0800, john stultz wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:50 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > In older kernels arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c:verify_pmtmr_rate
> > contained a check for sensible PMTMR rate and disabled that clocksource
> > if it was found to be out of spec[
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 13:50 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> In older kernels arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pm.c:verify_pmtmr_rate
> contained a check for sensible PMTMR rate and disabled that clocksource
> if it was found to be out of spec[0]. This check seems to have been lost
> in the transition to
10 matches
Mail list logo
