Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-14 Thread John R Lenton
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:28:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > For those of you with Via interrupting routing issues (or > interrupt-not-being-delivered issues, etc), please try out this patch > and let me know if it fixes things. It originates from a tip from > Adrian Cox... thanks Adrian! Just

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-14 Thread Axel Thimm
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:05:56PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Anyway, I am sending the dmesg with "#define DEBUG 1" in pci-i386.h. It is a > 2.4.4-ac5 defconfig kernel, but 2.4.4 has the same errors. System is an > MS-6330 v3.0 (MSI K7T Turbo), KT133A, Duron 700. I you have any idea, how I > could

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-14 Thread Axel Thimm
[Cc: list trimmed] On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:16:55PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:28:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > For those of you with Via interrupting routing issues (or > > > interrupt-not-being-delivered issues, etc), please try out thi

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Axel Thimm wrote: > > On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:28:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > For those of you with Via interrupting routing issues (or > > interrupt-not-being-delivered issues, etc), please try out this patch > > and let me know if it fixes things. It originates from a tip from > > Adr

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-14 Thread Axel Thimm
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 01:28:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > For those of you with Via interrupting routing issues (or > interrupt-not-being-delivered issues, etc), please try out this patch > and let me know if it fixes things. It originates from a tip from > Adrian Cox... thanks Adrian! Unfo

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-13 Thread Alan Cox
> > I disagree. The IO-APIC is the chipset APIC. It is distinct from the APIC > > on the processors. > > Disagree with which part? The fix, or likely needing a better ifdef? Needing a better ifdef > >From the point of view of the Via southbridge chip, IO-APIC is > external... The comment abov

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-13 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alan Cox wrote: > > > +/* we will likely need a better ifdef, something like > > + * ifdef CONFIG_EXTERNAL_APIC > > + */ > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC > > I disagree. The IO-APIC is the chipset APIC. It is distinct from the APIC > on the processors. Disagree with which part? The fix, or likel

Re: PATCH 2.4.5.1: Fix Via interrupt routing issues

2001-05-13 Thread Alan Cox
> +/* we will likely need a better ifdef, something like > + * ifdef CONFIG_EXTERNAL_APIC > + */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC I disagree. The IO-APIC is the chipset APIC. It is distinct from the APIC on the processors. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in