On Wed, 20 Sep 2000 10:22:50 -0400,
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dag Bakke wrote:
>> ROM image dump:
>> cs: no valid ROM images found!
>>
>> Same problem, or different problem? This time, the card is not even
>> detected...
>
>Look around for patches from Keith Owens relating to this,
Dag Bakke wrote:
>
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > Ok, it's time to get test9 running on my laptop, so I played the "what
> > code didn't get cut-n-pasted" game.
> >
> > With the attached tested patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre4, CardBus is
> > working again for me. This patch makes the logic match tha
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ok, it's time to get test9 running on my laptop, so I played the "what
> code didn't get cut-n-pasted" game.
>
> With the attached tested patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre4, CardBus is
> working again for me. This patch makes the logic match that of the old
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Ok, it's time to get test9 running on my laptop, so I played the "what
> code didn't get cut-n-pasted" game.
>
> With the attached tested patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre4, CardBus is
> working again for me. This patch makes the logic match that of the old
> code.
Well.
Still
Jeff Garzik writes:
> Ok, it's time to get test9 running on my laptop, so I played the "what
> code didn't get cut-n-pasted" game.
>
> With the attached tested patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre4, CardBus is
> working again for me. This patch makes the logic match that of the
> old code.
What patch?
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> With the attached tested patch against 2.4.0-test9-pre4, CardBus is
> working again for me. This patch makes the logic match that of the old
> code.
-ENOSLEEP. Here is the patch.
Index: drivers/pci/pci.c
===
R
6 matches
Mail list logo