Neil Brown wrote:
> The declaration of:
>
> struct file;
>
> in sysctl.h is a bit counter intuitive isn't it?
Nope. It's a useful technique that I was reminded of recently by DaveM.
Have you ever looked at the -nasty- include nesting that occurs because
key kernel headers include other key
On Sunday November 12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rasmus Andersen wrote:
> > I tried to include in md.c and had to include
> > also. Otherwise I got the following:
>
> Here is the solution I prefer... md builds fine with this, core kernel builds fine
>with this, and
> I'm about 3/4 of the wa
2 matches
Mail list logo
