On Mon, Jun 05, 2017 at 05:43:18PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 00:29 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:06:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko > linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 10:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 00:29 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:06:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 10:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times
> > > w
Hi Andy,
On Mon, 05 Jun 2017 17:06:45 +0300 Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 10:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times
> > without a report. But I guess a less generic name might be a good
> > idea to start with.
On Mon, 2017-06-05 at 10:07 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times
> without a report. But I guess a less generic name might be a good
> idea to start with.
>
> Andy: do you think UUID_INIT/GUID_INIT make sense to your?
> or _INITIALIZE
Meh, thanks. This has been throught the buildbot countless times
without a report. But I guess a less generic name might be a good
idea to start with.
Andy: do you think UUID_INIT/GUID_INIT make sense to your?
or _INITIALIZER?
Hi Christoph,
On Sun, 4 Jun 2017 22:14:13 +0200 Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> can you please include my uuid tree at:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/hch/uuid.git for-next
>
> into linux-next? We've been doing a fair amount of work on the
> uuid library and I plan to send it and some wo
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> - My branch is based on the latest stable, similarly to what I have
>>> seen elsewhere. One of the patches triggers a merge conflict on
>>> today's linux-next due to a whitespace change. Is there something I
>>> can do to fix this?
>>
>> Do
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:02:14 +0900 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> I am currently trying to get rid of the GENERIC_GPIO config option in
>> order to center GPIO support around gpiolib. The patch series has been
>> rathe
Hi Alexandre,
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 23:02:14 +0900 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> I am currently trying to get rid of the GENERIC_GPIO config option in
> order to center GPIO support around gpiolib. The patch series has been
> rather welcome and I collected a few acks, but since the change is
> rathe
9 matches
Mail list logo
