On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 03:46 -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The patch you sent claims that you maintain kernel/module.c.
>
> Indeed, which I don't want to. Rusty can keep that one for now :-)
Thanks 8)
BTW, just chiming in to officially ack Jon's handover of the overgrown
ex
Andrew Morton wrote:
No, I was thinking of a record which explicitly mentions module-init-tools.
It's not a part of the kernel, but it is closely connected to it, and this is
useful information to have in ./MAINTAINERS.
Ah, now that makes more sense. I was thinking you were thinking of an
exi
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:10:36 + Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> > >
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:17:31PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> > from Rusty at the end of last year.
> Cool. A patch to the kernel's ./MAINTAINER
On Thu, 01 Feb 2007 01:28:59 -0500 Jon Masters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I took over upstream maintainership of the module-init-tools package
> from Rusty at the end of last year.
Cool. A patch to the kernel's ./MAINTAINERS would be appreciated.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
5 matches
Mail list logo
