Mike Christie wrote:
> Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> Mark Hounschell wrote:
>>> Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
> Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO
>> interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24
>>
> I attached a backport of the patch from Tony (added as cc) that is in
> 2.6.25-rc2. Could you try it out against 2.6.24.2 just to make sure it
> was this patch, then we can send it to stable.
>
Yes, I had wanted to send this patch to -stable, but got distracted with
other bugs. So please
Mark Hounschell wrote:
Mark Hounschell wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
Mark Hounschell wrote:
I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO
interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24
worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
During r
Mark Hounschell wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Mike Christie wrote:
>>> Mark Hounschell wrote:
I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO
interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24
worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
Duri
Mike Christie wrote:
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> Mark Hounschell wrote:
>>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO
>>> interface of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24
>>> worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
>>>
>>> During reads I get these kernel mess
Mike Christie wrote:
Mark Hounschell wrote:
I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO interface
of 2.6.24.2. I have an application that up until 2.6.24 worked fine.
The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and other functions
_seem_
Mark Hounschell wrote:
I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO interface of 2.6.24.2.
I have an application that up until 2.6.24 worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel works fine.
During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and other functions _seem_ OK.
Actually basic
rea
Mark Hounschell wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:15 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO interface of
>>> 2.6.24.2.
>>> I have an application that up until 2.6.24 worked fine. The 2.6.23.16
>>> kernel works fine
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:15 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
>> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO interface of
>> 2.6.24.2.
>> I have an application that up until 2.6.24 worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel
>> works fine.
>>
>> During reads I get the
On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 10:15 -0500, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> I seem to have run into some sort of regression in the SG_IO interface of
> 2.6.24.2.
> I have an application that up until 2.6.24 worked fine. The 2.6.23.16 kernel
> works fine.
>
> During reads I get these kernel messages. Writes and
10 matches
Mail list logo
