On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, James Simmons wrote:
:
:>Err, tried the patch you recommended me to apply to the 2.4.3 source code
:>(not the 2.4.3-pre6), but everything else started complaining it couldn't
:>see printk() any more. Any advice? Thanks...
:
:Can you tell us your hardware configuration and yo
>Err, tried the patch you recommended me to apply to the 2.4.3 source code
>(not the 2.4.3-pre6), but everything else started complaining it couldn't
>see printk() any more. Any advice? Thanks...
Can you tell us your hardware configuration and your kernel configuration.
What do you mean it cou
Err, tried the patch you recommended me to apply to the 2.4.3 source code (not
the 2.4.3-pre6), but everything else started complaining it couldn't see
printk() any more. Any advice? Thanks...
--
/| _,.:*^*:., |\ Cheers from the Viking family,
| |_/' viking@ `\_| |
> I updated my kernel to 2.4.3 when the patch was released. As I said earlier, I
> noticed my timer losing a few seconds over the space of a couple of
> hours. Well, I have since found out that the amount of time lost is
> proportional to the load on the machine: the heavier the load, the more ti
Andrew Morton wrote:
> Eric Gillespie wrote:
> >
> >...
> > VESA fb mode 1280x1024x16, clock lost 1m 35s in time
> > ...
> > Same command, normal (non-fb mode) lost no time off clock.
>
> Is due to the 2.4.3 console drivers. They block interrupts during
> console output. There's a fix in 2.4.2-
Eric Gillespie wrote:
>
>...
> VESA fb mode 1280x1024x16, clock lost 1m 35s in time
> ...
> Same command, normal (non-fb mode) lost no time off clock.
Is due to the 2.4.3 console drivers. They block interrupts during
console output. There's a fix in 2.4.2-ac.
There's also a patch against 2.4.
6 matches
Mail list logo