On 4/30/2015 7:48 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 4/30/2015 4:20 AM, James Morris wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes
On 4/30/2015 4:20 AM, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
>
>> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
>>> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>>>
James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
the security tree? Are there remaini
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, John Johansen wrote:
> On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> >> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> >> pro
On 04/29/2015 06:55 PM, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
>>
>> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
>> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
>> procedure would you like to follow?
>
> What's the overall
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 11:55:51AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> >
> > James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> > the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> > procedure would you like to follow?
>
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
>
> James, do you want to take the module stacking changes in through
> the security tree? Are there remaining objections or concerns? What
> procedure would you like to follow?
What's the overall consensus on this -- do people generally see it as
use
6 matches
Mail list logo