Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY

2013-01-12 Thread Chris Samuel
/* Please CC, not on LKML */ On 13/01/13 00:08, Josh Boyer wrote: On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Chris Samuel wrote: > >> [...Debian kernel-build...] I'll file a bug against it asking for the it to not strip if CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set. Thanks for the pointer! Great. Glad you figured i

Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY

2013-01-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:28 AM, Chris Samuel wrote: > /* Please CC, not on LKML */ > > Hi Josh, > > > On 12/01/13 00:44, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> Check the installed modules. A simple: >> >> hexdump -C | tail -n 20 >> >> should be enough to tell you if the installed modules at least look lik

Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY

2013-01-11 Thread Chris Samuel
/* Please CC, not on LKML */ Hi Josh, On 12/01/13 00:44, Josh Boyer wrote: Check the installed modules. A simple: hexdump -C | tail -n 20 should be enough to tell you if the installed modules at least look like they're signed. You should see the expected "~Module signature appended~"

Re: MODSIGN: Modules fail signature verification with -ENOKEY

2013-01-11 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:41 AM, Chris Samuel wrote: > /* > * Rusty requested I send this to LKML, please CC me in on responses as > * I am not subscribed to LKML for sanity reasons. :-) > */ > > Hi Rusty, David, LKML, > > I suspect this is pilot error, or a deficiency in the Debian/Ubuntu > ma