On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 03:36:23PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> I have not taken^Whad the time to check the kernel tree
> and see if the RSS counting has indeed been made safe
> everywhere.
I have posted the one below a couple of times without it making
it in. If you like ot please fold it into y
On Mon, 8 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> About the RSS ulimit proposal, have we resolved the correctness
> of counting RSS in a process?
I have not taken^Whad the time to check the kernel tree
and see if the RSS counting has indeed been made safe
everywhere.
regards,
Rik
--
Virtual memory
About the RSS ulimit proposal, have we resolved the correctness of
counting RSS in a process?
Fei
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a TODO list for the memory management area of the
> Linux kernel, with both trivial things that could be done
> for later 2.4 releases an
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 10:13:27PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > > improvements
> >
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:27:38PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > No other then filesystem IO (page/buffercache) is actively tied
> > to the VM, so there should be no problems.
>
> Not right now, no. But if you know what is possible
> (and planned) with the kiobuf layer, you should think
> twice
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:20:24PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > > * VM: Use kiobuf IO in VM instead buffer_head IO.
> > >
> > > I'd vote for killing both bufer_head and kiobuf from VM.
> > > Lokk at my pageio patch - VM doesn't know about the
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 07:20:24PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > > * VM: Use kiobuf IO in VM instead buffer_head IO.
> >
> > I'd vote for killing both bufer_head and kiobuf from VM.
> > Lokk at my pageio patch - VM doesn't know about the use of kiobufs
> > in the filesystem IO...
>
> Could b
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > > improvements
> > > * VM: Quality of Service
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 02:56:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > * VM: experiment with different active lists / aging pages
> > of different ages at different rates + other page replacement
> > improvements
> > * VM: Quality of Service / fairness / ... improvements
> * VM: Use kiobuf IO
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Probably 2.5 era:
> * VM: physical->virtual reverse mapping, so we can do much
> better page aging with less CPU usage spikes
> * VM: move all the global VM variables, lists, etc. into the
> pgdat struct for better NUMA scalability
> * VM: per-node
On Fri, 05 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a TODO list for the memory management area of the
> Linux kernel, with both trivial things that could be done
> for later 2.4 releases and more complex things that really
> have to be 2.5 things.
>
> Most of these can be found on http://
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
>
> > here is a TODO list for the memory management area of the
> > Linux kernel, with both trivial things that could be done
> > for later 2.4 releases and more complex things that really
> > have to be 2.5 thin
On Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a TODO list for the memory management area of the
> Linux kernel, with both trivial things that could be done
> for later 2.4 releases and more complex things that really
> have to be 2.5 things.
>
> Most of these can be found on http:/
13 matches
Mail list logo
