On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:58:30PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Greg KH has said that he would like to remove the bus subsystem rwsem from
> the driver model. Here's a proposal for a way to accomplish that. The
> proposal is incomplete and requires changing the driver-model API a
> little; I'd l
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:10:11 -0500 (EST), linux-os
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thought experiment:
> Suppose you had a kernel-thread whos duty it was to handle the
> shutdown and restarting of devices on such busses. Since it
> is the only thing that would touch such code, wouldn't things
> be
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, linux-os wrote:
> Thought experiment:
> Suppose you had a kernel-thread whos duty it was to handle the
> shutdown and restarting of devices on such busses. Since it
> is the only thing that would touch such code, wouldn't things
> be a lot simpler and not subject to deadlocks?
Thought experiment:
Suppose you had a kernel-thread whos duty it was to handle the
shutdown and restarting of devices on such busses. Since it
is the only thing that would touch such code, wouldn't things
be a lot simpler and not subject to deadlocks?
Code calls something that puts the stuff the ke
4 matches
Mail list logo
