On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:32:56AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don'
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")?
>
> Unfortunately, I was too optimistic
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson
> wrote:
>
> Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")?
Unfortunately, I was too optimistic and did
Hi!
/-/blob/master/kconfig/debug
> > >
> > > Here's a boot dmesg from some affected machines from just before the merge
> > > with rc5:
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9676/shard-skl1/boot18.txt
> > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_9676/fi-skl-6600u/boot.htm
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:45:10AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:25 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:46:19PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > CI does confirm that the revert of d3921cb8be29 brings the machines back
> > > to life.
> >
> > I
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 8:25 AM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:46:19PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >
> > CI does confirm that the revert of d3921cb8be29 brings the machines back
> > to life.
>
> I still cannot see what could possibly go wrong, so let's revert
> d3921cb8be29 f
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:13:59PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:04:56)
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > > > Mike Rapoport (3):
> > > ...
> > > > mm: fix initialization
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 09:46:19PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48)
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06
Quoting Chris Wilson (2021-01-25 21:46:19)
> Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48)
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Mike: should we perhaps revert the first patch too (commit
> > > bde9cfa3afe4: "x86/setup: don't remove E820_TYPE_RAM for pfn 0")?
> >
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > > Mike Rapoport (3):
> > ...
> > > mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
> >
> > We ha
Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:33:48)
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:49:39PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > > > Mike Rapoport (3):
> > > ...
> > > > mm: fix initializa
Quoting Mike Rapoport (2021-01-25 21:04:56)
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > > Mike Rapoport (3):
> > ...
> > > mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
> >
> > We have half a dozen or
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:34:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > Mike Rapoport (3):
> ...
> > mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
>
> We have half a dozen or so different machines in CI that are silently
> failing t
On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 12:35 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> > Mike Rapoport (3):
> ...
> > mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
>
> We have half a dozen or so different machines in CI that are silently
> failing to boot,
Quoting Linus Torvalds (2021-01-25 01:06:40)
> Mike Rapoport (3):
...
> mm: fix initialization of struct page for holes in memory layout
We have half a dozen or so different machines in CI that are silently
failing to boot, that we believe is bisected to this patch.
17:56 tsa :
On 20:06 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 1/24/21 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
In fact, over 40% of
On 1/24/21 7:56 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>> So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
>>>
>>> In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today,
On 19:48 Sun 24 Jan 2021, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people
unloaded their work for the week on me. The end
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 05:06:40PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this rc looked fairly calm and small, all the way up until today.
>
> In fact, over 40% of the non-merge commits came in today, as people
> unloaded their work for the week on me. The end result is a slightly
> larger than usual
19 matches
Mail list logo
