On Wed 06-03-13 20:05:58, Harshana Ranmuthu wrote:
> > I don't know how to fix the issue without reverting the patch. Sorry.
>
> with reference to post URL
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=134997043820759&w=2
>
> I was going through this post, as we are also having problems with the
> same
> I don't know how to fix the issue without reverting the patch. Sorry.
with reference to post URL
http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=134997043820759&w=2
I was going through this post, as we are also having problems with the
same commit. In our case, we are appending to a file rather than
upda
On Thu 11-10-12 13:58:00, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> >The regression you observe is caused by commit 3d08bcc8 "mm: Wait for
> >writeback when grabbing pages to begin a write". At the first sight I was
> >somewhat surprised when I saw that code path in the traces but later
> >when I
> >>>
On Thu 11-10-12 11:52:54, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> On 2012.10.10. 22:27, Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Wed 10-10-12 22:44:41, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> >>On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>>On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks write
Hi,
On 2012.10.10. 22:27, Jan Kara wrote:
On Wed 10-10-12 22:44:41, Viktor Nagy wrote:
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or
On Wed 10-10-12 22:44:41, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> >>Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
> >>are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio.
>
Hi,
On 10/10/2012 06:57 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio.
The kernel 2.6.39 works nice.
How this hurt us in the rea
Hello,
On Tue 09-10-12 11:41:16, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> Since Kernel version 3.0 pdflush blocks writes even the dirty bytes
> are well below /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes or /proc/sys/vm/dirty_ratio.
> The kernel 2.6.39 works nice.
>
> How this hurt us in the real life: We have a very high performance
8 matches
Mail list logo