Hi,
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 03:47:58PM +0100, Romano Giannetti wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:21 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> > You could send me and the kernel mailing list a note about it anyway, of
> > course. (And perhaps pictures, if your dachshund is involved. Not that
> > we'd be
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:21 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> You could send me and the kernel mailing list a note about it anyway, of
> course. (And perhaps pictures, if your dachshund is involved. Not that
> we'd be interested, of course. No. Just so that we'd know to avoid it next
> time).
Hi
Toralf Förster wrote:
> Hello,
>
> the build with the attached .config failed, make ends with:
> ...
> CC lib/rwsem.o
> CC lib/semaphore-sleepers.o
> CC lib/sha1.o
> CC lib/string.o
> CC lib/vsprintf.o
> AR lib/lib.a
> LD arch/i386/lib/built-in.o
>
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 08:35 +0100, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> or I can send you the kernel patch as file and the xen hypervisor:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 244694 2006-04-19 12:14 /boot/xen-3.0.2-2.gz
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 604942 2006-04-19 12:14
> /usr/src/kernel-patches/diffs/xen/linux-2.6.
Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote:
Hi,
1st you should put this information on http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
ok, thanks.
your bug kept me the attention because on bad interrupts you have :
21: 10 IO-APIC-fasteoi ohci1394
Exactly oops on 10 interrupts, I had seen this before .
I have
Hi,
1st you should put this information on http://bugzilla.kernel.org/
(choose enter a new bug, may choose Category ACPI with component
config-interrupts ) for better organization, instead make your own bug
documentation.
The documentation is very good you should attach the same information
on bu
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:06:57 -0500 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>
>> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:54:38 +0100, Matthijs wrote:
>>
>> > make modules gives me these warnings in modpost and then errors out:
>> > WARNING: Can't handle masks in drivers/ide/pci/atiixp:05
>>
>>
On Sat, 2 Dec 2006 23:06:57 -0500 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:54:38 +0100, Matthijs wrote:
>
> > make modules gives me these warnings in modpost and then errors out:
> > WARNING: Can't handle masks in drivers/ide/pci/atiixp:05
>
> Messag
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 02 Dec 2006 20:54:38 +0100, Matthijs wrote:
> make modules gives me these warnings in modpost and then errors out:
> WARNING: Can't handle masks in drivers/ide/pci/atiixp:05
Message is from scripts/file2alias.c::do_pci_entry():
if ((baseclass
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> There it finally is (or rather - I'm currently uploading the tar-file and
> patches, and the mirrors are hopefully busily pushing out the git tree
> that is already updated).
>
> There's not a lot to be said about the changes since -rc6: the shortlog
> (appended) tells t
On Thursday 30 November 2006 21:30, Malte Schröder wrote:
> I also encountered this bug (wasn't there in -rc6). The patch also fixes it
> for me.
Ok, I have to make a correction here: It doesn't crash anymore but now ipv6
doesn't work at all. To be more precise, I see adresses on the network
int
On Friday 01 December 2006 22:32, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:33:03PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> > OpenVZ has been using them for more than a month already ;-)
>
> great for you, here some details:
>
> - 2.6.19 was released 29th Nov 2006
> - OpenVZ page shows 2.6.9-023
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 01:33:03PM +0300, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> OpenVZ has been using them for more than a month already ;-)
great for you, here some details:
- 2.6.19 was released 29th Nov 2006
- OpenVZ page shows 2.6.9-023, 2.6.16 and the
2.6.18 development
- Linux-VServer has followe
Great !
I'm dreaming that the next patchsets will not require as much
debate. nah, stop dreaming Cedric :)
Thanks to Andrew and Linus who made it happen.
C.
Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> OpenVZ has been using them for more than a month already ;-)
>
> Kirill
>
>> Ladies and Gentlemen!
>>
>> here
OpenVZ has been using them for more than a month already ;-)
Kirill
> Ladies and Gentlemen!
>
> here is the first Linux-VServer version (testing)
> with support for the *spaces (uts, ipc and vfs)
> introduced in 2.6.19 ...
>
> http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Experimental/patch-2.6.19-vs2.1.x-t1.dif
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 11:32:59PM +0100, Udo A. Steinberg wrote:
>
> I didn't and that turned out to be the culprit. With CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC enabled
> everything works fine. Thanks, Herbert!
>
> Shouldn't cryptoloop automatically select CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC if it depends on
> it?
Yes I'll make it
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 08:15:12 +1100 Herbert Xu (HX) wrote:
HX> Udo A. Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
HX> >
HX> > Ok, so 2.6.18 used to get along fine with cryptoloop and 2.6.19 refuses to
HX> > cooperate. An strace of "losetup -e aes /dev/loop0 /dev/hda7" without all
HX> > the terminal inter
Udo A. Steinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ok, so 2.6.18 used to get along fine with cryptoloop and 2.6.19 refuses to
> cooperate. An strace of "losetup -e aes /dev/loop0 /dev/hda7" without all the
> terminal interaction shows:
Did you enable CONFIG_CRYPTO_CBC?
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at
Needed the VIA PATA patch to be able to boot:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/6/18/165
Also, atakbd.c produced lots of "Spurious ACK" messages on kernel panic
when I misspecified the root fs, which made the real problem a little
more difficult to find.
--
Jindrich Makovicka
-
To unsubscribe from thi
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 05:08:15PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:56:31 -0600 Greg Norris wrote:
> > On a similar vein, it'd be nice if http://www.kernel.org/kdist/version.html
> > would break the entries into separate lines.
>
> I prefer to use
> http://www.kernel.org/kdist/
Getting an oops on boot here, caused by commit
e81c73596704793e73e6dbb478f41686f15a4b34 titled
"[NET]: Fix MAX_HEADER setting".
Reverting that patch fixes things up for me. Dave?
Phil
Bringing up interface eth0:
skb_over_panic: text:c02af809 len:56 put:16 head:d7e213c0
data:d7e213d0 tail:d7
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:56:31 -0600 Greg Norris wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:11:11PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > What would it take to have the kernel.org web page and finger banner
> > give the correct version information? (yessir, not your problem)
>
> On a similar vein, it'd be nice
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 03:11:11PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> What would it take to have the kernel.org web page and finger banner
> give the correct version information? (yessir, not your problem)
On a similar vein, it'd be nice if http://www.kernel.org/kdist/version.html
would break the entr
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:21:21 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds (LT) wrote:
LT> So go get it. It's one of those rare "perfect" kernels. So if it doesn't
LT> happen to compile with your config (or it does compile, but then does
LT> unspeakable acts of perversion with your pet dachshund), you can rest eas
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:21:12 + Alan wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:11:11 -0800
> > Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > What would it take to have the kernel.org web page and finger banner
> > > give the correct version informati
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 21:25:14 -0200 Geraldo Netto wrote:
> uhm, you may try it :P
>
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
> http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2
Yep. but that's not the point.
> Geraldo
>
> On 29/11/06, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On
uhm, you may try:
changelog, ..., ...
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
and
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2
for direct access
Geraldo
On 29/11/06, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:21:12 + Alan wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 200
uhm, you may try it :P
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.19.tar.bz2
Geraldo
On 29/11/06, Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:21:12 + Alan wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:11:11 -0800
> Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:11:11 -0800
Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What would it take to have the kernel.org web page and finger banner
> give the correct version information?
Patience 8)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a messag
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:21:12 + Alan wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 15:11:11 -0800
> Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What would it take to have the kernel.org web page and finger banner
> > give the correct version information?
>
> Patience 8)
OK. How many days?
---
~Randy
-
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:21:21 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> There it finally is (or rather - I'm currently uploading the tar-file and
> patches, and the mirrors are hopefully busily pushing out the git tree
> that is already updated).
>
> There's not a lot to be said about the changes s
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 14:21 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> You could send me and the kernel mailing list a note about it anyway, of
> course. (And perhaps pictures, if your dachshund is involved. Not that
> we'd be interested, of course. No. Just so that we'd know to avoid it next
> time).
:-)
Toralf F??rster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> WARNING: "hdlc_close" [drivers/net/wan/dscc4.ko] undefined!
> WARNING: "hdlc_open" [drivers/net/wan/dscc4.ko] undefined!
> WARNING: "alloc_hdlcdev" [drivers/net/wan/dscc4.ko] undefined!
> WARNING: "unregister_hdlc_device" [drivers/net/wan/dscc4.ko] unde
Hi,
I just wanted to report a 'it works again' for rc6: after encountering
the very same problems with -rc3 Jeff Garzik described in [0], I
upgraded to -rc5 and applied the proposed[1] patch[2].
Now, the knfsd behaved a bit better (nfs-mounted /home, X11
applications created thousands of empty
34 matches
Mail list logo
