Hi!
> Hello, I am trying to find the reason for very, very poor network
> performance with sustained data transfers on Linux 2.4.1. I found
> a work-around, but don't think user-mode code should have to provide
> such work-arounds.
>
>In the following, with Linux 2.4.1, on a dedicated 100/Ba
> I'm still talking with Alexey about how to fix this, I might just
> prefer killing this fallback mechanism of skb_alloc_send_skb then
> make AF_UNIX act just like everyone else.
>
> This was always just a performance hack, and one which makes less
> and less sense as time goes on.
When I first
Richard B. Johnson writes:
> > unix socket sends eat into memory reserved for atomic allocs.
OK (Manfred is being quoted here, to be clear).
I'm still talking with Alexey about how to fix this, I might just
prefer killing this fallback mechanism of skb_alloc_send_skb then
make AF_UNIX act just
Hello,
The problem with awful socket performance on 2.4.1 has been discovered
and fixed by Manfred Spraul. Here is some info, and his patch:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Could you post your results to linux-kernel?
> My mail from this morning wasn't accurate enough, you patched
4 matches
Mail list logo
