Re: Linux 2.4.0-test11/12 freezes when copying large amounts of data to loop file system

2000-12-15 Thread Keith Owens
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 14:55:59 -0500, Gerard Beekmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Every time I try to copy a specific directory to a mounted loop file system, >Linux freezes up on me. I've tried this several times and it freezes up at >the same place every time. When I copy that same directory to

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Georg Nikodym] > + case 'x': > + fprintf(stderr, > + "klogd: %c option is obsolete. Ignoring\n", ch); Clearer (IMHO): "klogd: warning: ignoring obsolete option '-%c'\n", ch); Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send t

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-11 Thread Georg Nikodym
> "KO" == Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KO> Looks good, except that you need to keep the option flags for KO> backwards compatibility. There are a *lot* of scripts out there KO> which invoke klogd with various options and they will fail with KO> this change. It is OK to issue

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-11 Thread Keith Owens
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000 20:13:46 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Here's a patch (against sysklogd-1.3-31) that completely tear out the >symbol processing code. Looks good, except that you need to keep the option flags for backwards compatibility. There are a *lot* of script

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-11 Thread Georg Nikodym
> "GN" == Georg Nikodym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: GN> Here's a patch (against sysklogd-1.3-31) that completely tear out GN> the symbol processing code. Doh! Forgot a chunk (to be applied after the others): diff -Nru a/src/sysklogd-1.3-31/Makefile b/src/sysklogd-1.3-31/Makefile --- a/sr

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-11 Thread Georg Nikodym
> "KO" == Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KO> klogd maps the kernel messages from text to syslog levels and KO> does some fiddling with kernel log levels at start up. It needs KO> to be more than a simple 'cat'. When symbol handling was added KO> to klogd, ksymoops was built int

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-08 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:30:06 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >But since you seem to and while we're doing extreme surgery, why have >klogd at all? Every other unix, kernel messages are handled by the >syslog system. What problem did klogd solve and does that problem >stil

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-08 Thread Georg Nikodym
> "KO" == Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KO> You only removed the module symbol handling. The problem is that KO> the entire klogd oops handling is out of date and broken. I KO> recommend removing all oops processing from klogd, which means KO> that klogd does not need any symb

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-07 Thread Keith Owens
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:36:01 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "KO" == Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > KO> I would prefer to see the oops decoding completely removed from > KO> klogd. > >Since nobody else has weighed in on this issue, I quickly did the >nec

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-07 Thread Georg Nikodym
> "KO" == Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KO> I would prefer to see the oops decoding completely removed from KO> klogd. The only justification for klogd converting the oops is KO> to save users from running ksymoops by hand. I would not mind KO> klogd capturing the oops text, f

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11 and sysklogd-1.3-31

2000-12-06 Thread Keith Owens
On Wed, 6 Dec 2000 17:24:58 -0500 (EST), "Georg Nikodym" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >sysklogd 1.3-31 no longer compiles using the latest headers in test11. > >Strictly speaking this isn't a kernel bug... > >sysklogd's ksym_mod.c includes Speaking as the modutils maintainer and the person who ad

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11: _isofs_bmap: block < 0

2000-11-27 Thread Andries Brouwer
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 09:09:12PM +0100, Jörg Schütter wrote: > after upgrading from test9 to test11, skipping test 10, I get > the messages "_isofs_bmap: block < 0", "_isofs_bmap: block < ..." > which also means I can't read the cd. A FAQ. Remove the two lines - if (filp->f_pos >= inod

Re: Linux 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-19 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > - Asit Mallick: enable the APIC in the official order What is this intended to fix? Please revert it -- it breaks for i82489DX APICs configured to the PIC mode upon boot -- local interrupt registers are hardwired to 0x0001 and cannot be chan

Re: Linux 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-19 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Rich Baum wrote: > > The patch is in the v2.3 directory. You may want to move it to the > v2.4 directory so people can find it easier. Oops. Thanks. Done. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me

Re: Linux 2.4.0-test11

2000-11-19 Thread Rich Baum
The patch is in the v2.3 directory. You may want to move it to the v2.4 directory so people can find it easier. On 19 Nov 2000, at 18:19, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > Ok, test11 is out there. The most noticeable fixes since pre7 are the > Athlon lockup fix, the PCI routing handling, and getting

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11-pre2 compilation error: undefined reference to `bust_spinlocks'

2000-11-11 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"reiser.angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > cannot make a success compilation of 2.4.0-test11pre2 with the same > .config than for a successfull 2.4.0-test10 compilation. > Same problem when apply patch-2.4.0test11pre2-ac1 from alan cox > > arch/i386/mm/mm.o: In function `do_page_fault': > arch

Re: linux-2.4.0-test11-pre2 compilation error: undefined referenceto `bust_spinlocks'

2000-11-11 Thread Tigran Aivazian
On Sat, 11 Nov 2000, reiser.angus wrote: > cannot make a success compilation of 2.4.0-test11pre2 with the same > .config than for a successfull 2.4.0-test10 compilation. > Same problem when apply patch-2.4.0test11pre2-ac1 from alan cox > > arch/i386/mm/mm.o: In function `do_page_fault': > arch/