> Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug
> that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of
probably
> Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final?
I dont plan to. Now is not the time to do this. We also need to understand the
issue in detail
Greetings!
Will this kernel still have the 'VM: do_try_to_free_memory failed' bug
that is plaguing us here? If so, my I suggest adding a merge of
Andrea's fix on the TODO list for 2.2.18 final?
Take care,
--
Camm Maguire[EMAIL PROTECTED]
==
On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> 2.2.18pre16
> o Finally get the m68k tree merged(Andrew McPherson
>and a cast of many)
Ah. Very good.
> o NFSv3 server patches merge (Dave Higgen)
This is
> P.S. I apologize if this driver is allready marked EXPERIMENTAL for 2.2.x
> -- but I don't have the disk space right now to check, and I wanted to make
> sure that, as the maintainer, my official opinion on the matter was voiced.
Its already marked experimental, no problem.
-
To unsubscribe fro
> Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under
> asm-i386? :-)
Its called 'I can apply this last diff just a minute before release, it cant
possibly go wrong'.
Fixed in my tree
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body o
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 01:27:25AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> -=usb backport (no effect if you say no to usb)
Alan --
As the USB Mass Storage driver maintainer, I'd like to ask you to mark the
USB Mass Storage driver as EXPERIMENTAL for the 2.2.x kernel series.
This is an unsupported, known b
Any particular reason why the new asm-m68k/*.h headers ended up under
asm-i386? :-)
I know this makes more work for you Alan, but all of these silly
errors (bogus reject files left in the tree, mistakedly leaving
vmlinux.lds autogenerated files in the tree, etc.) would have a
minuscule chance of
7 matches
Mail list logo
