Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Mark Hahn
> > - metrics -- L1 cacheline size is the important one: you align array ... > Anyone can give me some pointers on how this is done runtime ? (name of > the .c file is fine). kernel/sched.c:aligned_data. as mentioned elsewhere, the correct alignment is not necessarily L1 linesize. - To unsubsc

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
> - metrics -- L1 cacheline size is the important one: you align array > elements to this size when you want a per-cpu array, so that multiple > CPUs do not share a cacheline for accessing their "own" structure. > Proper alignment avoids "cacheline ping-pong", as it's called, > whenever t

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2000-12-12T12:26:26, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > And thus it follows that 2.2.18 is the least buggy kernel ever, since > > it has gotten the most bug fixes. > > > > Right? (: > Hopefully not. I _do_ hope that 2.2.18 is the least buggy kernel ever... Why do you hope otherwise? ;

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Alan Cox
> - maybe they'll need to patch lm_sensors to accommodate the increased > temperature range since the P4 runs so hot. (: (: Also there is a new 'rep nop' instruction that means 'short pause' and is used in spinlocks. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kern

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Alan Cox
> And thus it follows that 2.2.18 is the least buggy kernel ever, since > it has gotten the most bug fixes. > > Right? (: Hopefully not. Remove arch/m68k arch/arm include/asm-m68k include/asm-arm drivers/usb drivers/char/agp drivers/char/

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread David Weinehall
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 09:30:37PM -0600, Paul Fulghum wrote: > From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Linux 2.2.18 Release Notes > > patch-2.2.18.tar.gz size=2.9MBytes Ehrm?! A tar'ed-up patch?! You didn't mean something like: 3049653 Dec 11 00:45 patch-2.2.18.gz now did you?! :^) > fr

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-12 Thread Bruce Korb
Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [AC] > > > ... added basic support for the Pentium IV. > [Android] > > How is the Pentium IV more advanced than the Pentium III, other than > > speed? Why would LInux care about a 1500 MHz clock or 400 MHz bus > > speed? Just treat the PIV as a faster PIII

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Samuelson
[AC] > > ... added basic support for the Pentium IV. [Android] > How is the Pentium IV more advanced than the Pentium III, other than > speed? Why would LInux care about a 1500 MHz clock or 400 MHz bus > speed? Just treat the PIV as a faster PIII. It all sounds so simple, right? Se

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-11 Thread Android
> ... added basic support for the Pentium IV. Unfortunately Intel chose to > ignore all precedent in model numbering via cpuid and report a > family of '15'. This sudden jump broke assumptions in the > kernel tree without any warning. Intel have failed to p

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-11 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Paul Fulghum] > from my scanning of the kernel archives, this is the *all time* > largest kernel patch (including 2.3/2.4 patches). And thus it follows that 2.2.18 is the least buggy kernel ever, since it has gotten the most bug fixes. Right? (: Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: Linux 2.2.18 release notes

2000-12-11 Thread Paul Fulghum
From: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Linux 2.2.18 Release Notes patch-2.2.18.tar.gz size=2.9MBytes from my scanning of the kernel archives, this is the *all time* largest kernel patch (including 2.3/2.4 patches). Go team :-) Paul Fulghum - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u