> The pipe bandwidth is intimately related to pipe latency. Linux pipes
> are fairly small (only 4kB worth of data buffer), so they need good
> latency for good performance.
...
> The pipe bandwidth could be fairly easily improved by just doubling the
> buffer size (or by using VM tricks), but it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Chris Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>> First test was with 2.4.0-test10-pre3.
>> Next four tests were with 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
>> Final four tests were with 2.2.18-pre17.
>>
>> All are 'virgin' kernels, without any pa
On Tue, Oct 24, 2000 at 02:24:24AM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote:
> On 2000-10-23, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hardware:
> > Dual P-II 400 Mhz
> > 128 MB RAM
> > 13GB hard drive
>
> > First test was with 2.4.0-test10-pre3.
> > Next four tests were with 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
> > Final
On 2000-10-23, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hardware:
> Dual P-II 400 Mhz
> 128 MB RAM
> 13GB hard drive
> First test was with 2.4.0-test10-pre3.
> Next four tests were with 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
> Final four tests were with 2.2.18-pre17.
Would it be meaningful to run two concurrent LM
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> First test was with 2.4.0-test10-pre3.
> Next four tests were with 2.4.0-test10-pre4.
> Final four tests were with 2.2.18-pre17.
>
> All are 'virgin' kernels, without any patches.
[...]
I'll take the liberty of highlighting some big changes, v2.2 vs v
5 matches
Mail list logo
