Re: Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs

2001-01-17 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 17 Jan 01 at 13:41, Urban Widmark wrote: > SIGKILL or SIGSTOP can be already pending, or perhaps received while > waiting in socket->ops->recvmsg(). recvmsg will then return -ERESTARTSYS > because signal_pending() is true and the smbfs code treats that as a > network problem (causing unnecessar

Re: Killing process with SIGKILL and ncpfs

2001-01-17 Thread Urban Widmark
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > Hi, > Maarten de Boer pointed to me, that if you load some simple program, > such as 'void main(void) {}', trace into main (break main; run) > and then quit from gdb (Really exit? yes), child process is then > killed due to INT3 (probably). Then exit