Re: Kernel bug 60770

2014-09-19 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 12:24 -0400, Peter Hurley wrote: > Mike, > > The changes for clflush don't build prior to 3.17-rcX; > X86_BUG_CLFLUSH_MONITOR was X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH_MONITOR prior to > commit 9b13a93df267af681a66a6a738bf1af10102da7d, > 'x86, cpufeature: Convert more "features" to bugs'. Ye

Re: Kernel bug 60770

2014-09-19 Thread Peter Hurley
On 08/28/2014 09:53 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 09:23 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Josh Boyer >> wrote: >>> Hi Len, >>> >>> Kernel bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 is marked >>> as closed, but there is a patch that at le

RE: Kernel bug 60770

2014-08-28 Thread Brown, Len
ISTR that I got interrupted when working on that one and never got back to it. Also, I think I had a puzzling power measurement result -- like I had measured a power benefit, and then i couldn't find a benefit. (No matter, should be a perf benefit even if ISO power) Next week I should have acces

Re: Kernel bug 60770

2014-08-28 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2014-08-28 at 09:23 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Josh Boyer > wrote: > > Hi Len, > > > > Kernel bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 is marked > > as closed, but there is a patch that at least one user seems to need > > to get things booti

Re: Kernel bug 60770

2014-08-28 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sat, Aug 16, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > Hi Len, > > Kernel bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60770 is marked > as closed, but there is a patch that at least one user seems to need > to get things booting properly. It was sent upstream a while ago: > > http://marc.info/