Re: kbuild problem

2007-11-01 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> > I think I found it -- in my scripts. :) > They still think that $ARCH is i386 or x86_64, not "x86". > I'm testing a fix for that now. Good - thanks for reporting back. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PR

Re: kbuild problem

2007-11-01 Thread Randy Dunlap
On Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:21:45 +0100 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:39:00PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Hi Sam, > > > > I have daily/nightly builds + test runs that use something like: > > (but more complicated than this) > > > > cp saved.config.file arch/$ARCH/config.default >

Re: kbuild problem

2007-10-31 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 06:39:00PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Hi Sam, > > I have daily/nightly builds + test runs that use something like: > (but more complicated than this) > > cp saved.config.file arch/$ARCH/config.default > EXPORT KBUILD_DEFCONFIG=config.default > make defconfig KBUILD_DEFC

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 20.02.2007 15:59 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > I'm usually someone who likes to avoid including unneeded code in the > kernel, but in this case I'd say KISS - and build it always into the > gigaset module. There seems to be a clear majority for this solution. So KISS it will be. Thanks for all the a

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Adrian Bunk schrieb: > > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:22:10AM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > >> > >> > asyncdata.o is only needed for M105 and M101, not for the base > >> > driver. Ho

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-20 Thread Joerg Dorchain
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 02:56:27PM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > One disadvantage of this approach is that in a kernel with > > CONFIG_GIGASET_BASE=y, you can't later compile and load the usb_gigaset > > or ser_gigaset modules without rebooting since they require a change to > > the kernel im

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-20 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Adrian Bunk schrieb: > On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:22:10AM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> >> > asyncdata.o is only needed for M105 and M101, not for the base >> > driver. How do I express in Kbuild that asyncdata.o is to be added >> > to gigaset-y o

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-18 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:22:10AM -0500, Kai Germaschewski wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > > > Alright, then so be it. But that raises another question: > > asyncdata.o is only needed for M105 and M101, not for the base > > driver. How do I express in Kbuild that asyncdata.o

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-17 Thread Kai Germaschewski
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Alright, then so be it. But that raises another question: > asyncdata.o is only needed for M105 and M101, not for the base > driver. How do I express in Kbuild that asyncdata.o is to be added > to gigaset-y only if CONFIG_GIGASET_M105 and CONFIG_GIGASET

Re: Kbuild problem

2007-02-17 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Am 17.02.2007 11:52 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:04:33AM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: >> [...] I'd prefer a >> Makefile which builds modular usb_gigaset.ko and/or ser_gigaset.ko >> like the present one (including asyncdata.o), but when linking >> usb-gigaset.o and ser-gigaset.o

Re: Kbuild problem (was: [2.6 patch] drivers/isdn/gigaset/: build asyncdata.o into the gigaset module)

2007-02-17 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 01:04:33AM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 16.02.2007 09:33 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > >>> ... > >>> LD drivers/isdn/gigaset/built-in.o > >>> drivers/isdn/gigaset/ser_gigaset.o: In function `gigaset_m10x_send_skb': > >>> (.text+0xe50): multiple definition of `gigaset_m1