Re: Jiffy question and sound.

2001-03-19 Thread watermodem
watermodem wrote: > > Matti Aarnio wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:20:47AM -0600, watermodem wrote: > > > With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386) > > > with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy. > > ... > > > #define LOOPS_PER_SEC current_cpu_data.loops_per_jif

Re: Jiffy question and sound.

2001-03-19 Thread watermodem
Matti Aarnio wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:20:47AM -0600, watermodem wrote: > > With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386) > > with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy. > ... > > #define LOOPS_PER_SEC current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * 100 > > The intention was

Re: Jiffy question and sound.

2001-03-19 Thread Matti Aarnio
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:20:47AM -0600, watermodem wrote: > With the 2.4.0 kernel the loops_per_sec field was replaced (for i386) > with current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy. ... > #define LOOPS_PER_SEC current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy * 100 The intention was to accomodate systems with faster tha