Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Lee Revell
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:16 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > As a data point I went back to a 2.6.10 kernel which predates some > latency fixes that went into mainline. > I think most of the important ones had already gone in by then. It would be more interesting to compare it with 2.6.8. Lee - To

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:31 am, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 7/20/05, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:04 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23 am, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > - netwo

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 7/20/05, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:04 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23 am, Daniel Walker wrote: > > > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > - networking is another frequent source of latencies - it might ma

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 11:04 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23 am, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > - networking is another frequent source of latencies - it might make > > >sense to add a workload doing lots of socket IO.

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:23 am, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > - networking is another frequent source of latencies - it might make > >sense to add a workload doing lots of socket IO. (localhost might be > >enough, but not for everything) > >

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 00:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > - networking is another frequent source of latencies - it might make >sense to add a workload doing lots of socket IO. (localhost might be >enough, but not for everything) The Gnutella test? Daniel - To unsubscribe from this

Re: Interbench real time benchmark results

2005-07-19 Thread Daniel Walker
On Wed, 2005-07-20 at 08:16 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > Interestingly the average latencies are slightly higher (in the miniscule > <2us > range), but the maximum latencies are excellently bound to 25us. > > The results are quite reproducible. I would guess that the average latencies are tunab