On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:44:20AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Yes, these patches should be made against the latest development
> tree, not the stable tree.
Thanks for the comments and advice, I'll make a new set of patches
against Linus' tree and post them in when they are ready.
Nick.
--
PGP
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:16:53 +0300 Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Nick Andrew wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:42:07PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> Nick Andrew wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:09AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
> Here is a series of 9 patches to init/Kconfig intend
Quoting Pavel Emelyanov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Nick Andrew wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:42:07PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> Nick Andrew wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:09AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
> Here is a series of 9 patches to init/Kconfig intended to improve
Nick Andrew wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:42:07PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Nick Andrew wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:09AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
Here is a series of 9 patches to init/Kconfig intended to improve the
usefulness and consistency of the help descrip
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 05:42:07PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Nick Andrew wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:09AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
> >> Here is a series of 9 patches to init/Kconfig intended to improve the
> >> usefulness and consistency of the help descriptions. The patches are
Nick Andrew wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:06:09AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
>> Here is a series of 9 patches to init/Kconfig intended to improve the
>> usefulness and consistency of the help descriptions. The patches are
>> against linux-2.6.24.2.
>> [...]
>> Patch 3
>> USER_NS
>> P
6 matches
Mail list logo