* Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it's a 2.6.24.1 candidate i believe. We trigger plenty of various
> > crashes during x86.git maintenance and others hit various crashes in
> > -mm, so by the time .1 is released we'll have it in .25 and can
> > backport it. Most folks/distros will
On 01/10/2008 01:54 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
>> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static inline unsigned long print_contex
>> unsigned long addr;
>>
>> addr = frame->return_address;
>>
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 07:54:38AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>...
> it's a 2.6.24.1 candidate i believe. We trigger plenty of various
> crashes during x86.git maintenance and others hit various crashes in
> -mm, so by the time .1 is released we'll have it in .25 and can backport
> it. Most folks
* Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +++ linux-2.6.24-rc7/arch/x86/kernel/traps_32.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static inline unsigned long print_contex
> unsigned long addr;
>
> addr = frame->return_address;
> - ops->address(data, addr);
> +
4 matches
Mail list logo