Just to follow up, on Vojtech's advice I installed kernel 2.4.0 instead(I
also moved to 7.0 RH to accomplish this) and everything seems to be working
fine(I did not apply your new patches Vojtech, as yet they have not proved
necessary). I have not done any exhaustive testing, however the failure r
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 12:45:13AM -0800, you [Andre Hedrick] claimed:
>
> > But it works on all ATA disks? Does it work for SCSI as well?
>
> The KIOBUFS version may, but not the taskfile version.
Ok.
> > I think it would be cool if you'd make it available (on linux-ide.org?),
> > so that pe
> But it works on all ATA disks? Does it work for SCSI as well?
The KIOBUFS version may, but not the taskfile version.
> I think it would be cool if you'd make it available (on linux-ide.org?),
> so that people install servers (and anybody who _cares_) could test their
> hardware/driver combina
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 05:14:02PM -0800, you [Andre Hedrick] claimed:
> On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Tim Fletcher wrote:
>
> > > Well that is useless test them because you can not test things completely.
> >
> > I ment that if the partiton has no persient data on it then the test can
> > be run (the te
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Tim Fletcher wrote:
> > Well that is useless test them because you can not test things completely.
>
> I ment that if the partiton has no persient data on it then the test can
> be run (the test wipes all data on the partition out during the test,
> right?) with no loss of d
> > > maybe but why?
> >
> > Because it stores no data, hence the wiping out of it is no problem?
>
> Well that is useless test them because you can not test things completely.
I ment that if the partiton has no persient data on it then the test can
be run (the test wipes all data on the partitio
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Tim Fletcher wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > Cute. Can it be run on say a swap partition?
> >
> > maybe but why?
>
> Because it stores no data, hence the wiping out of it is no problem?
Well that is useless test them because you can not test things completely.
Andre Hedrick
L
> > Hi!
> >
> > Cute. Can it be run on say a swap partition?
>
> maybe but why?
Because it stores no data, hence the wiping out of it is no problem?
--
Tim Fletcher - Network manager .~.
/V\ L I N U X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]// \\ >Do
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Cute. Can it be run on say a swap partition?
maybe but why?
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 11:53:36AM -0700, Terrence Martin wrote:
> Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Ok, just for a test, before I finish the 2.2 version of the new VIA IDE
> > driver, could you try with the 2.4.0 kernel if it fixes the behavior?
> >
>
> Hmm ok I will give it a try...this
Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ok, just for a test, before I finish the 2.2 version of the new VIA IDE
> driver, could you try with the 2.4.0 kernel if it fixes the behavior?
>
Hmm ok I will give it a try...this will have to wait for a few hours as I am at
work. btw, how easy is it to install 2
Hi!
Cute. Can it be run on say a swap partition?
Vojtech
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:40:13AM -0800, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> I may have a new test tool but it is completely destructive the content on
> the drives. It walks the drives and fills every sector with a unique
> pattern and then you ca
I may have a new test tool but it is completely destructive the content on
the drives. It walks the drives and fills every sector with a unique
pattern and then you can read it back and checksum the contents.
It does destroy the content on the drive, this is no worse than a random
"File System
Hi!
Ok, just for a test, before I finish the 2.2 version of the new VIA IDE
driver, could you try with the 2.4.0 kernel if it fixes the behavior?
By the way, what motherboard is this?
Andre: Thanks for sending this to me, this is the case I was looking for
- true data corruption on 2.2 kernel.
Good Morning Vojtech!
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Terrence Martin wrote:
> I am having all sorts of nasty file corruption problems with 2.2.18
> patched with
> ide.2.2.18.1221.patch.gz
> linux-2.2.18-reiserfs-3.5.29-patch.gz
> raid-2.2.18-B0
>
> The corruption is occuring on my WDC AC28400R(I also ha
15 matches
Mail list logo