Hayes, Stuart wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
>>> Hm... I've got a 0.95. I'll try to get a Via EHCI 1.00 controller
>>> and make sure it's the same problem.
>>
>> Yeah, for some reason way too many of the add-on PCI cards with VIA
>> chips use that pretty-broken VT6202 chip. Ones with VT6212 are
David Brownell wrote:
>> Hm... I've got a 0.95. I'll try to get a Via EHCI 1.00 controller
>> and make sure it's the same problem.
>
> Yeah, for some reason way too many of the add-on PCI cards with VIA
> chips use that pretty-broken VT6202 chip. Ones with VT6212 are also
> available, and work a
> > I think 8237 was about where they forked off the the VT6212 as
> > their first discrete EHCI (for addon cards) claiming EHCI 1.0
> > conformance. Too bad they didn't recycle all the VT6202 chips
> > in their inventory at that time...
>
> No hardware producer would have done that ;)
As I said:
David Brownell wrote:
> > ehci_hcd :00:10.4: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004
> >
> > Build into:
> > 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge
> > [K8T800/K8T890 South]
>
> Yeah, VT8235 was their first southbridge with integrated EHCI.
> ISTR that the VT8237 wo
> Hm... I've got a 0.95. I'll try to get a Via EHCI 1.00 controller and
> make sure it's the same problem.
Yeah, for some reason way too many of the add-on PCI cards with
VIA chips use that pretty-broken VT6202 chip. Ones with VT6212
are also available, and work a lot better.
> > Regarding the
> ehci_hcd :00:10.4: USB 2.0 started, EHCI 1.00, driver 10 Dec 2004
>
> Build into:
> 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800/K8T890
> South]
Yeah, VT8235 was their first southbridge with integrated EHCI.
ISTR that the VT8237 worked a bit more smoothly.
I think 8
Daniel Exner wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
>> On Monday 13 August 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
> [..]
>>> Where exactly should I search for this? Neither lspci nor lsusb
>>> showed any hint on the EHCI rev. the chip conforms to..
>>
>> The driver logs that information as it starts; on this sytem:
>>
David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 13 August 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
[..]
> > Where exactly should I search for this? Neither lspci nor lsusb showed
> > any hint on the EHCI rev. the chip conforms to..
>
> The driver logs that information as it starts; on this sytem:
>
> ehci_hcd :00:02.2: US
On Monday 13 August 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
> David Brownell wrote:
> > On Monday 13 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > With the VIA controller I have,
> >
> > Which kind is that? The VT6202 is buggy as all get-out, and
> > they sold a *LOT* of those discrete chips for use in add-on PCI
David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 13 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > With the VIA controller I have,
>
> Which kind is that? The VT6202 is buggy as all get-out, and
> they sold a *LOT* of those discrete chips for use in add-on PCI
> cards. We generally warn people away from those. A mo
On Monday 13 August 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> With the VIA controller I have,
Which kind is that? The VT6202 is buggy as all get-out, and
they sold a *LOT* of those discrete chips for use in add-on PCI
cards. We generally warn people away from those. A more current
version is the VT6212,
Daniel Exner wrote:
> Jiri Kosina wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
>>> Please CC me, as I'm currently not subscribed to this list, thx.
>>
>> Please also don't forget to CC relevant people/lists when reporting
>> bugs, thanks.
> Guess its ok, now? Thanks anyway :)
>
>>> After so
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
>
>> After some serious hangs with 2.6.23-rc2 I did some bisects and this
>> was the result:
>> 196705c9bbc03540429b0f7cf9ee35c2f928a534 is first bad commit commit
>> 196705c9bbc03540429b0f7cf9ee35c2f928a534
>> Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
> > Please CC me, as I'm currently not subscribed to this list, thx.
>
> Please also don't forget to CC relevant people/lists when reporting bugs,
> thanks.
Guess its ok, now? Thanks anyway :)
> > After some serious hangs with 2.6.23-rc
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Daniel Exner wrote:
> Please CC me, as I'm currently not subscribed to this list, thx.
Please also don't forget to CC relevant people/lists when reporting bugs,
thanks.
> After some serious hangs with 2.6.23-rc2 I did some bisects and this was the
> result:
> 196705c9bbc03
15 matches
Mail list logo
