Re: DVS regulator drivers

2012-11-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:02:57AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:52:09PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > /* Always set the ON status to the minimum voltage */ > > > but I actually don't see, where the minim

Re: DVS regulator drivers

2012-11-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Sorry, one more point, that I raised in the original mail yesterday and that I forgot about, when replying today: On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:52:09PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: [snip] > > /* Always set the ON status to the minimum voltage */

Re: DVS regulator drivers

2012-11-20 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 09:17:46AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > Please don't invent terminology or repurpose existing terminology like > > this, it's just confusing - obvious essentially all regulators covered > > by the regulator API support vol

Re: DVS regulator drivers

2012-11-20 Thread Guennadi Liakhovetski
Hi Mark Thanks for your reply. On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:52:09PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > As I mentioned in an earlier mail today [1] I have a difficulty seeing how > > the current regulator API can efficiently be used for DVS-type regula

Re: DVS regulator drivers

2012-11-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:52:09PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > As I mentioned in an earlier mail today [1] I have a difficulty seeing how > the current regulator API can efficiently be used for DVS-type regulators. Please don't invent terminology or repurpose existing terminology like