first, sorry for posting so much :|
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 15:05 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper S
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 14:47 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > > there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
> > > > would this m
On Fri, Jan 28 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > > there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
> > > would this mean that i should not use cpu frequency scaling?
> >
> > Worth
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 23:48 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > > there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
> > would this mean that i should not use cpu frequency scaling?
>
> Worth an experiment but I'd be suprised if it was your fix. T
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 23:01, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > there are certainly chipset and CPU errata in this area.
> would this mean that i should not use cpu frequency scaling?
Worth an experiment but I'd be suprised if it was your fix. The more
data the better however
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:44:06 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 20:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > I've got several reports like this that only happen with ACPI, and one
> > > user whose burns report fine but are corrupted if ACPI is allowed to do
> > > power manglement.
On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:02:54 +0100, Alessandro Suardi
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:44:06 +, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 20:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > I've got several reports like this that only happen with ACPI, and one
> > > > user w
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 21:44 +, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 20:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > I've got several reports like this that only happen with ACPI, and one
> > > user whose burns report fine but are corrupted if ACPI is allowed to do
> > > power manglement.
> >
> > Really weir
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 20:45, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > I've got several reports like this that only happen with ACPI, and one
> > user whose burns report fine but are corrupted if ACPI is allowed to do
> > power manglement.
>
> Really weird, I cannot begin to explain that. Perhaps the two reporters
>
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:45:29 +0100, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 15:07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > 794034176/4572807168 (17.4%) @2.4x, remaining 18:47
> > > > 805339136/4572807168 (17.6%) @2.4x, remaining 18:42
> > > > :-[ [
On Mon, Jan 24 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 15:07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > 794034176/4572807168 (17.4%) @2.4x, remaining 18:47
> > > 805339136/4572807168 (17.6%) @2.4x, remaining 18:42
> > > :-[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with SK=3h/ASC=0Ch/ACQ=00h]: Input/output
> > > error
> > >
On Llu, 2005-01-24 at 15:07, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 794034176/4572807168 (17.4%) @2.4x, remaining 18:47
> > 805339136/4572807168 (17.6%) @2.4x, remaining 18:42
> > :-[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with SK=3h/ASC=0Ch/ACQ=00h]: Input/output error
> > builtin_dd: 396976*2KB out @ average 2.4x1385KBps
> >
On Mon, Jan 24 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 11:46 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:
> > On Monday 24 Jan 2005 06:59, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > >
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > have you
On Mon, Jan 24 2005, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:07 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > have you checked, that cd
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 11:46 +1000, Tim Fairchild wrote:
> On Monday 24 Jan 2005 06:59, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
> > > growisofs
On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 16:07 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
> > > growisofs/dvd+rw-tools
On Mon, Jan 24 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:07:55 +0100, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > hav
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:07:55 +0100, Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
> > > gr
On Sun, Jan 23 2005, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and growisofs/dvd+rw-tools
> > is?
> >
> > I had some probs, solved with a simple chmod +s growis
On Monday 24 Jan 2005 06:59, Alessandro Suardi wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and
> > growisofs/dvd+rw-tools is?
> >
> > I had some probs, solved with a simple chmod +
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:26:55 +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and growisofs/dvd+rw-tools
> is?
>
> I had some probs, solved with a simple chmod +s growisofs :)
Lucky you. Burning as root here, cdrecord not suid. Tr
Hi,
have you checked, that cdrecord is not suid root, and growisofs/dvd+rw-tools
is?
I had some probs, solved with a simple chmod +s growisofs :)
Glück Auf
Volker
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majord
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:06:54 +0100, Kasper Sandberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hello, i followed the last thread, "unable to burn DVD", and there was a
> patch, which was said to work, but it does not.. (i am running
> 2.6.11-rc1-bk9)..
>
> the problem started around 2.6.9 (or something like it)
23 matches
Mail list logo