Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 20 August 2007 22:19, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > > > > > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > > > > > not expect an external drive to eat that much power from the system

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > > > > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > > > > not expect an external drive to eat that much power from the system, > > > > especially when not used. I am told that VIA chips ar

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Monday, 20 August 2007 19:29, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > > > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > > > not expect an external drive to eat that much power from the system, > > > espe

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > > not expect an external drive to eat that much power from the system, > > especially when not used. I am told that VIA chips are notoriously ba

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Jean Delvare
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag 20 August 2007 schrieb Jean Delvare: > > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > > not expect an external drive to eat that

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Montag 20 August 2007 schrieb Jean Delvare: > If I rmmod "ehci-hcd" then the power consumption is back to 69 W. This > confirms that this is really USB-related. I have to admit that I did > not expect an external drive to eat that much power from the system, > especially when not used. I am told

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-20 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Rafael, On Sun, 19 Aug 2007 22:42:43 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, 19 August 2007 15:32, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Hi all, hi Rafael, > > > > Running kernel 2.6.23-rc3-git1, I noticed yesterday that my CPU (AMD > > Sempron 2600+) was running at a much lower temperature when > > CO

Re: CONFIG_SUSPEND and power consumption

2007-08-19 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Sunday, 19 August 2007 15:32, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi all, hi Rafael, > > Running kernel 2.6.23-rc3-git1, I noticed yesterday that my CPU (AMD > Sempron 2600+) was running at a much lower temperature when > CONFIG_SUSPEND was enabled. Hm, interesting. > The temperature difference was qu