[John Cowan]
> The whole point of CML2 is to make kernel configuration something
> that Aunt Tillie (or a reasonable facsimile thereof) can do, and we
> are all Aunt Tillies from time to time. That includes differing
> standards of readability,
Come on, that's absolutely a red herring. There a
> > telling us the Tk library, which for 8 or 10 years has been pretty much
> > *the* X toolkit/widget set for scripting, does not include an interface
> > to X resources?
Of course it does; in an idiosyncratic way (not directly using X
resources) but it does use the X resource file syntax.
> If
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 11:20:48PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Wait ... I thought you were just using Python bindings to Tk. Are you
> > telling us the Tk library, which for 8 or 10 years has been pretty much
> > *the* X toolkit/widget set for scriptin
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 05:42:23PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Release 1.1.3:
First I must say that versions 1.1.2, 1.1.3 are much faster
than previous, I really cannot say that CML2 is in some way
unusable for me. Good work!
> * Freeze color changed from cyan to blue.
Erm. Yes, in
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wait ... I thought you were just using Python bindings to Tk. Are you
> telling us the Tk library, which for 8 or 10 years has been pretty much
> *the* X toolkit/widget set for scripting, does not include an interface
> to X resources?
If it does, it's not
[esr]
> If there were already a library in ths stock Python distribution to
> digest .Xdefaults files I might consider this. Perhaps I'll write
> one. But I'm not going to bulk up the CML2 code with this marginal
> feature.
Wait ... I thought you were just using Python bindings to Tk. Are you
6 matches
Mail list logo
