On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:58:19AM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 23/05/2019 10:54, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> Hi Steven,
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> >>> I'll spin a real patch and add you
On 23/05/2019 10:54, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi Steven,
>>
>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
>>> I'll spin a real patch and add your Tested-by
>>
>> Did you send this out? I can't spot it in my inbox.
>
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:31:38AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> > I'll spin a real patch and add your Tested-by
>
> Did you send this out? I can't spot it in my inbox.
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190516143125.48948
Hi Steven,
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> I'll spin a real patch and add your Tested-by
Did you send this out? I can't spot it in my inbox.
Cheers,
Will
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:20:59PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 16/05/2019 15:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:05:31PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> >> I suspect the following is sufficient to fix the problem:
> >>
> >> 8<-
> >> diff --git a/init/initramfs.c b/init/i
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > void __weak free_initrd_mem(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> > {
> > + if (!start)
> > + return;
> > +
> > free_reserved_area((void *)start, (void *)end, POISON_FREE_INITMEM,
> >
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 05:13:14PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:41:06PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Since commit:
> > >
> > > 54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free initrd memory if op
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:05:31PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
> On 16/05/2019 14:41, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Since commit:
> >>
> >> 54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free initrd memory if opening
> >> /initrd.image fai
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:41:06PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Since commit:
> >
> > 54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free initrd memory if opening /initrd.image
> > fails")
>
> Ugh, I dropped a paragarph here.
>
> S
On 16/05/2019 15:16, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 03:05:31PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 16/05/2019 14:41, Mark Rutland wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi,
Since commit:
54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free init
On 16/05/2019 14:41, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since commit:
>>
>> 54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free initrd memory if opening /initrd.image
>> fails")
>
> Ugh, I dropped a paragarph here.
>
> Since that commit, I'm seeing
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since commit:
>
> 54c7a8916a887f35 ("initramfs: free initrd memory if opening /initrd.image
> fails")
Ugh, I dropped a paragarph here.
Since that commit, I'm seeing a boot-time splat on arm64 when using
CONFIG_DEBUG_VIRT
12 matches
Mail list logo